Trying to decide between repairing our deck and tearing it down for a rebuild
Trying to decide between repairing our deck and tearing it down for a rebuild. It's about 250 square feet, cedar, roughly twenty years old. Several boards are cupped and a couple are soft, but the frame seems fine from what I can see. A contractor told me repairs on something this age are throwing good money after bad, which may be true or may be him preferring a bigger job. How do you actually make this call? We use the deck constantly from May through September, so whatever we do needs to be done in one season rather than dragged out over a couple of years.
The honest test is the frame, not the boards. If joists, beam and posts are sound, replacing decking and railings is a legitimate repair and considerably cheaper than a rebuild. If the framing is compromised at multiple points, you're rebuilding whether you admit it now or in three years. So get the substructure evaluated before deciding, and ask for that evaluation in writing. We were in the same spot and GotRot's Seattle Deck Repair assessment found our frame was solid, so we redecked. Twenty years is old for cedar decking but not automatically for framing. Also price the two options side by side rather than sequentially, it's easier to judge when both numbers are in front of you.